Photos showing possible small drinking glass with stem in living room

Click to expand and reduce an image.  Click and drag a large image to move it.
U.S. Government photos (closeup created by webmaster)

Possible small drinking glass with stem (circled by webmaster) in living room
Possible small drinking glass with stem (circled by webmaster) in living room
Possible small drinking glass with stem (circled by webmaster) in living room
Possible small drinking glass with stem (circled by webmaster) in living room

CID Findings


April 1, 1971:  USACIL Interpretation of Unidentified Latent Fingerprints

USACIL Interpretation of Unidentified Latent Fingerprints, page 1  Page 1
USACIL Interpretation of Unidentified Latent Fingerprints, page 1


Exhibit P (Drinking glass from front room)

     Fingerprint - appears as narrow ridge formation often found in a woman's print
or little finger of male, or from a young adult.


USACIL Interpretation of Unidentified Latent Fingerprints, page 2  Page 2
USACIL Interpretation of Unidentified Latent Fingerprints, page 2


LEGEND:  Fingerprint - a latent print containing the core or delta or both.

March 29, 1972:  USACIL Consolidated Report

USACIL Consolidated Report, page 27  Page 27
USACIL Consolidated Report, page 27


Paragraph 10:  Comparison of the latent prints developed on Exhibits previously identified, with the record prints submitted revealed:

     a.  Exhibits P thru T - No matching impressions.

FBI Fingerprint Report


Full transcript

(Emphasis added)

. . . The thirty remaining, eighteen latent palm prints, and six latent impressions appearing exhibits, 1x2, 2x5, 2x34, 3x1, 3x4, 3x6, 3x10, 3x12, 3x20, 3x22, 3x25, 3x29, 4x17, 4x23, 5x4, 5x6, 5x7, 5x11, 5x12, 5x14, 5x18, 6x5 and 6, 6x7, 6x9, 7x1, 7x2, J, L-24, P, S-1, S-2, M, Q, and Z were compared with the available inked prints of Jeffrey Robert MacDonald, Colette S. MacDonald, and with the available inked prints of 125 individuals, whose names appear on the attached list, but no identification were effected. Conclusive comparisons could not be made in some instances because the inked prints are not fully recorded, including tips, sides, lower joint areas of fingers and palm prints, and some of the copies of prints are not completely legible.


NOTES

February 17, 1970 - April 10, 1972: Excerpts from CID Reinvestigation    

July 14, 1970: Discussion at the Article 32 hearing

July 14, 1970: Hilyard Medlin (CID) at the Article 32 hearing    

February 12, 1975: Excerpt from FBI Fingerprint Report